cycleback.com................cards main


Judging the Authenticity of Early Baseball Cards

by David Rudd Cycleback

Chapter 17 : 'Real Photo' Baseball Cards

(c) cycleback 2003, 2005 all rights reserved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Many early baseball cards are not printing press and ink prints but actual photographs. These actual photograph cards are commonly referred to as 'real photo.' A majority of 1800s baseball cards are real photo. Though only a small number of 20th century cards are real photo, this includes a number of popular issues.

The following is a shortlist of real photo issues.

1800s: These are the cards with the sepia realistic images. N172 and N173 Old Judges, Gypsy Queen, SF Hess, Peck & Snider CDVs and trade cards, Four Base Hits, the Kalamazoo Bats issues, G & B Gum, Yum Yum Tobacco, Newsboy Cabinets. (Though they resemble real photo cards, with realistic images, the 1890s Just So and N300 Mayo are not real photo.)

1900s: T200 Fatima Team, Fatima Premium, T222 Fatima, T5 Pinkerton Cabinet Cards.

 

Distinguishing a photograph from a mechanical print: "Dots Versus No Dots"

Not all realistic looking pictures are photographs, and the collector should be able to tell the difference between photographs and photomechanical prints (realistic pictures made by a printing press). The images in this book, for example, are not actual photographs but computer prints. The pictures in a newspaper or magazine, or on most 20th century baseball cards are photomechanical reproductions of photographs.

While a mechanical print, like a lithograph or photoengraving, is made by a printing press pressing ink against paper or cardstock, a photograph is made by the subtle interaction of light with chemicals. A photographic image is made by a chemical process.

A handheld microscope will allow one to easily distinguish between a photograph and a non-photograph. Close examination of a photograph will reveal great subtly in tones and shades. The tones can be so subtle that they seem as if you can't get the microscope into focus. Under the microscope, the photomechanical print will be made up of tiny dots or similar ink patterns.

 

Most reprints of real photo cards have the halftone dot pattern

The vast majority of reprints of known real photo cards are quickly identified due to the dot pattern in the player's image. If you see a dot pattern on an Old Judge or Four Base Hits, you know it's a reprint. A beginner with a strong magnifying glass should have no trouble identifying the average Old Judge reprint.

As counterfeits and reprints occasionally (though scarcely) exist in real photo form, the following is a more in depth look at the processes used to make early real photo cards.

* * * *

1800s real photo baseball cards : albumen prints


1800s real photo baseball cards were made with the albumen photographic processes. They are often called albumen photographs or albumen prints. In photography, a photographic image on a piece of paper is commonly called a print, even though it wasn't made with a printing press.

While there were other types of photographs in the 1800s, the albumen print was by far the most common form of paper photograph in the United States and around the world. Nearly all post-1850s paper photographs, baseball cards or otherwise, are albumen. Even non-collectors associate horse-and-buggy pictures with the soft, sentimental tones that were produced by the albumen process.

Except for modernized versions made by a few advanced art photographers, the albumen process is as obsolete as the Model T. It hasn't been used commercially for about a century, having long ago been replaced by more advanced technology.

During its 19th century heyday, the albumen process was used by a wide range of photographers and for a wide range of photos. It was used by famous photographers and unknown small town studios. It was used to make the priceless photo hung today in a Paris or New York museum and the Joseph Hall cabinet card sold by MastroNet, official portraits of Queen Victoria and many of the photos in your family collection. This means that, by studying the cabinet card of your great great uncle or that $2 cabinet you bought at a flea market, you are also studying the qualities of the Old Judge Cabinet.

The albumen process was time-consuming and difficult in the extreme compared to modern photography. Most practitioners were well-trained professionals with a working knowledge of chemistry. Except for a few technically gifted and wealthy hobbyists, there were no amateur photographers like today.

The process required a unique kind of chemically treated paper that was mostly imported from France and Germany. Photography is a chemical process and the photographer couldn't use any old typing or writing paper he got at the local dime store. Only a few factories in the world made albumen paper. This is lucky for us today, because this albumen paper has distinct qualities that are usually straightforward to identify.

One of the distinct qualities of 1800s albumen prints is that they are on super thin paper. The paper was so thin and delicate that the prints had to be mounted. This means that the photographic print was pasted to a heavy backing. Usually the backing is a sheet of cardboard, but albumen prints can also be found mounted in or on books, programs and other items. All 1800s albumen baseball cards have a cardboard backing. With the N172 Old Judges, the albumen print is the same size as the backing. With the N173 Old Judge and other cabinets cards the print is pasted to a larger backing.

The albumen images are usually well aged. This includes the common sepia or yellowish tone, often along with fading of the image details in areas and foxing (brownish redish age spots). Particularly due to different storage, the severity and type of aging will vary. For collectors, albumen photos are best stored away from light, excessive heat and humidity. An example of excessive heat is storing them next to a radiator. When originally made, albumen images were not sepia but closer to black and white. You will sometimes find examples that were well stored and retain these colors. Albumen images are often glossy.

Many albumen images have very fine web-like pattern of cracking. This is often seen up close with the naked eye. Sometimes a normal magnifying glass or loupe is needed. The cracking, which does not appear on all albumen prints, can be throughout the entire image or in isolated areas.

One of the keys to authenticating albumen prints is examining the image area under a microscope. Unlike with the later gelatin silver prints or Kodak photos, the paper fibers can be seen on the albumen print. It takes some practice, but with experience it's not difficult to see the paper fibers with a microscope of 50 or more power. When judging the authenticity of an expensive albumen photograph, for myself or others, I always take my trusty microscope and look for paper fibers in the image.

Though uncommon, it is possible to find 1880s albumen prints that are pink (by far the most common), blue, green, yellow and other bright colors. The process to add dye to the albumen paper was invented at this time. The pink old judges are commonly underdeveloped (too light).

Some albumen prints have a distinct effect called 'silvering.' Silvering is when it appears as if the silver has come to surface of the image. Sort of like a silver patina. If it exists, it is more noticeable at the edges and in the dark areas of the image, and when viewed at a specific angle to the light. If you change the angle of the photo to a light source, the silvering will be come stronger and darker, sometimes disappearing. It can range in intensity. Sometimes it is only revealed under close examination when holding the photo nearing a 180 degree to a light. Sometimes it is obvious in an online auction image. Importantly for collectors, silvering is an aging process. In simple words, a photograph with natural silvering wasn't made yesterday.

 


Foxing, age spots and overall yellowing common to albumen prints. Foxing is often heavier than this, and can appear on the cardboard mount as well.

 

 

 

1900s Real Photo Baseball Cards : Gelatin Silver

1914 Pinkerton Cabinet Card of Shoeless Joe Jackson, with a gelatin silver print affixed to a larger cardboard mount

Early 1900s real photo baseball cards were gelatin silver photographs, commonly called gelatin silver prints.

What albumen prints were to 19th century photographs, gelatin silver prints were to early 20th century photographs. Gelatin silver was by far the most common form of black and white photograph from the late 1890s to recent years. If you own a T200 Fatima team card, a 1930s movie still photo or a 1960s wirephoto, you own a gelatin silver photograph. If you go to an exhibit of original photographs by famous early 20th century photographers, many to most will likely be gelatin silver prints. Those 1940s black and white snapshots in your family albums are more than likely gelatin silver.

While gelatin silver photographs were commonly used for many years, early examples have distinct qualities that help the collector to identify them as vintage.

Many gelatin silver photographs have stark black and white images, distinct to the sepia tones of an albumen print. However, many vintage gelatin silver images are found with sepia tones, sometimes closely resembling 1800s albumen prints. This sepia tinge is most often caused by the toning of the paper, but was sometimes intentionally created by the photographer.

Though not as thin as albumen paper, early gelatin silver paper is thin. The earlier the thinner. The modern 'double weight' photo paper was not popularly introduced until after the scope of this guide. An example of double weight paper is the typical modern autographed 8x10 photo.

Most vintage gelatin silver paper (as seen on the back of the photo) will be off white and often with toning and foxing. Counter to intuition, however, the earliest examples, say 1902 or 1904, typically has bright white paper, though still with occasional foxing, soiling and other discoloration. The earliest paper was handmade without wood pulp. Wood pulp, introduced to later photo paper production, is what makes later photos and newspapers turn brown. The earliest handmade gelatin silver paper was naturally white and, since there was no wood pulp, did not tone with age. This means that you should not be distressed if the paper on your 1903 Honus Wagner photo is so much brighter than on your 1920s photo cards.

Many early gelatin silver prints are mounted in similar fashion to albumen prints. Most are unmounted (plain paper photograph with no cardboard backing). The T5 Pinkerton Cabinets are mounted just like an N173 Old Judge or Newsboy Cabinet. The T200 and T222 are just a photographic print on thin paper with no cardboard backing.

Unlike albumen prints, the paper fibers in the gelatin silver print cannot be seen under a microscope. The gelatin silver photos have a thin layer of gelatin on the image surface. The gelatin was used to hold the needed photographic chemicals to the paper. While transparent, the gelatin obscures the paper fibers from view. When viewing under a microscope, you may see the uneven surface of the gelatin. With experience this surface is easily distinguished from paper fibers.

Silvering as the best sign of authenticity
Many, though not all, early 1900s real photo cards have some degree of silvering. Silvering is less likely to appear on photos with underexposed images. Genuine silvering is one of the surest signs of authenticty. If that $5,000 Fatima Premium that you just bought has silvering, and otherwise looks the way a Fatima Premium should, you can be confident that your purchase is authentic.

 

Silvering: Surrounding the border of this framed early 1900s gelatin silver photo is silvering. It appears here as a distinct fogging or frosting at the edges.


Ray-O-Prints and Other Self-Developing Photos


Ray O Print of Babe Ruth

Around 1930 M.P.& Co issued several photo-kit issues for kids. The best known set was the Ray-O-Print kit that included of Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Mary Pickford, Herbert Hoover, and other celebrities. Each kit consisted of an envelope containing a photographic negative of one celebrity and a piece of photographic paper about the size of a trading card. This allowed a kid to make one photo card.

It is possible in modern times to make multiple copies of from the original negative by getting more photopaper. It is safest for the collector to buy a Ray-O-Print photograph when it is accompanied by the original kit. This not only makes authenticity sense, but the accompanying kit raises the value and desirability of the photo card. The entire kit with photo is not often seen on the market.

Black light tests will identify most modern photographic paper. The presence of silvering will prove that a photo card is old, even when there is no accompanying kit.

There were other Pre-WWII self developing photo cards. Again, the presence of silvering will assure the collector that the card is genuine, even if there is no kit.


cycleback.com................cards main

(c) david rudd cycleback, cyclback.com all rights reserved